News / E-Bulletin
Aug 14,2021
Business rescue proceedings are proceedings aimed to facilitate the rehabilitation of a company that is financially distressed by providing for – the temporary supervision of the company, and the management of its affairs, business and property, by a business rescue practitioner; a temporary moratorium (stay) on the rights of claimants against the company or in respect of property in its possession; and the development and implementation, if approved, of a business rescue plan to rescue the company by restructuring its business, property, debt, affairs, other liabilities and equity (section 128(1)(b)).
The aim of business rescue is to restructure the affairs of a company in such a way that either maximises the likelihood of the company continuing in existence on a solvent basis or results in a better return for the creditors of the company than would ordinarily result from the liquidation of the company (section 128(1)(b)(iii)).
A BRP is a person appointed, or two or more persons jointly appointed, to oversee a company during business rescue. While the Act defines a BRP as one or more persons, the business rescue provisions of the Act do not necessarily refer to or support joint appointment. Further, the word “person” in the Act includes a juristic person. It is therefore arguable that a company can take appointment as a business rescues practitioner (section 128(1)(d)).
Affected persons are important role players in the business rescue process. An affected person is a shareholder, creditor, employee (or their representative) or a registered trade union representing employees of the company. Affected persons have various rights throughout the business rescue process (section 128(1)(a)).
The test for whether or not a company should be placed in business rescue is whether or not the company is financially distressed. The Act defines the words “financially distressed” (section 128(1)(f)) to mean that – it appears to be reasonably unlikely that the company will be able to pay all of its debts as they become due and payable within the immediately ensuing six months (commercial insolvency); or it appears to be reasonably likely that the company will become insolvent within the immediately ensuing six months (factual insolvency).
A company should commence business rescue proceedings at the first signs of it being financially distressed, within the meaning of the Act. That is, either when it is reasonably unlikely that a company will be able to pay its debts when they fall due for payment in the immediately ensuing six months or when it is likely that the company will become insolvent in the immediately ensuing six months.
Post-commencement finance is finance provided to the company once business rescue proceedings have commenced. Section 135(1) of the Act also provides that any remuneration, reimbursement for expenses or other amount of money relating to employment that becomes due and payable by a company to an employee during business rescue, is also considered to be post-commencement finance.
A business rescue plan is a plan developed and, if approved, implemented by the business rescue practitioner, which details the manner in which the practitioner envisages that the company will be rescued. The plan is the culmination of the business rescue process.
Read more about the Business Rescue plan South Africa.
Read more about the Business Rescue Proceedings in South Africa
Business rescue proceedings are not necessarily suitable for all companies. The type of company is for the most part determinative as to whether or not a company is a suitable candidate for business rescue. For instance, companies that are involved in retail are more suitable for business rescue than companies that have been set up for property investment purposes, as retail companies have a “business” that can be rescued, while property investment companies may not.
In a recent decision of the South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, in the case of Oakdene Square Properties (Pty) Ltd v Farm Bothasfontein (Kyalami) (Pty) Ltd 2012 JPR 0239 (GSJ) the court considered the plausibility of business rescue in an instance where liquidation was preferable. In this instance, the court dismissed the application for rescue and held that a liquidation of the company would achieve a similar result to that of a business rescue.
This judgment makes it clear that prior to a company, or an affected person, placing a company in business rescue, consideration should be given to the nature of the company, the extent to which business rescue is the appropriate procedure for that company and the extent to which business rescue would be more beneficial for the company than liquidation.
If the answer to the latter question is yes, rescue proceedings are likely to be successful. If not, liquidation may be the preferred alternative.
NEWS / Legal Brief
Food-focused Market Inquiry Lift Off! The Commission officially launches Fresh Produce Market InquiryNEWS / Legal Brief
2023 Electricity Regulation Guide – South AfricaNEWS / E-Bulletin
The Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Bill is a step closer to becoming law